Skip to main content

Obesity, regulation and grey areas


You don’t have to look far these days to find some discussion of obesity and its causes. This week it was put to the British Medical Association conference that we should ban junk food from hospitals. Two days before this J T Winkler argued in the BMJ that we need a new “brutal pragmatism on food” and that the traditional instruments of public health were all ineffectual or unacceptable in the case of food.

The traditional instruments Winkler laments are education, taxation and regulation.   He does though, comment positively on the Food Standards Agency (FSA) efforts to reduce salt consumption through reformulating food and public awareness campaigns. He is right to laud these efforts, which showed a decrease in average salt intake from 9.5 grams a day in 2000/01 to 8g/d in 2011 as well as adults becoming less likely to add salt at the table over the same period.

Despite concerns over the extent to which board members at the FSA may have had conflicting interests, it seemed generally well regarded and not subject to the severe scepticism which greeted the launch of the Public Health Responsibility Deals. These Deals have been criticised as allowing the food industry a seat at the policy making table, while it seems improbable to be in their interests to reduce the sale of unhealthy foods.  We have recently seen strongly worded pronouncements that the food industry should have no role in the formation of nutrition policy, as well as being billed as vectors of disease by some. 

Some of the scepticism over the Responsibility Deals comes from doubts over the extent to which industry interest will override health concerns, whether monitoring will ever truly be independent and their voluntary nature. A recent review of voluntary agreements between governments and business concluded that many countries are moving towards formal approaches to voluntary agreements and that some of the most effective contain sanctions for non-compliance. Some of the agreements included in their review don’t sound particularly voluntary at all.

This blurring of the line between voluntary agreements and regulation is, it seems, the reason why Winkler condemns regulation as ineffectual but praises the FSA efforts (which in my opinion seem closer to regulation than anything else). It is not clear whether the Responsibility Deals will make the nation healthier, and the review above noted that it is not currently clear whether (or in what circumstances) voluntary agreements can be more effective than more traditional regulation. What is clear is that scepticism around these Deals still remains, and that the potential benefits of reducing the consumption of salt, sugar and fat are still huge.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Introducing the WATCCH Project - Widening Access to Careers in Community Healthcare

The Undergraduate Primary Care Education team in the Department of Primary Care and Public Health at Imperial College London has kicked off an exciting new work experience programme called WATCCH – Widening Access to Careers in Community Healthcare.
There is a shortage of work experience in the health sector for pupils, particularly for those who have no connection to healthcare professionals. WATCCH aims to open up work experience opportunities in the healthcare sector by offering placements for sixth form pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds to shadow various allied healthcare professionals in general practices. These 16/17 year olds have completed their GCSEs with good grades, do not have placements elsewhere, and are the first in their family applying to university. 
Pupils will attend a pre-placement induction at Imperial College's Charing Cross Hospital Campus, and will then have a 3-day work experience session at a general practice where they will observe a variety of allie…

Say hello, wave goodbye...

Our GP Derm and Paeds Course Lead Dr Emma Metters sadly left us this month to take a new post at St George's. She reflects on her time at Imperial below:
My time as GP Derm and Paeds Course Lead has come to an end but the good news is the wonderful Senita Mountjoy is returning from her maternity leave to take up the post again.  She brings so much energy and enthusiasm for the courses that she was instrumental in the design of initial delivery of.  I am sure she has many ideas of where she wants to take them so watch this space for new and exciting teaching developments on the horizon.
This is not really goodbye as I will be continuing my involvement in Imperial in various ways so may well cross paths with some of you again.  I have really enjoyed my time at Imperial, in several different roles, and have gained a wealth of experience which I will be taking with me to my new role as Clinical Lecturer in Primary Care at St George’s University. 
I hope many of you continue your invo…

Year 3 MICA (Medicine in the Community Apprenticeship) course update

The year 3 Medicine in the Community Apprenticeship pilot year is drawing to a close and the new cohort of 150 students have been selected and are ready and poised to start phase 2 in September 2017!
Our wonderful tutors have done an excellent job hosting students for 10 weeks at their surgeries. We have really seen our students thrive during this attachment. We have realised the value in giving the students true authentic roles where they begin seeing their own patients in clinic by week 3 and follow up their own patient case loads throughout. The student feedback has been overwhelmingly positive and they have really enjoyed feeling like integral members of the team.
Not only have we had involvement from excellent GP tutors, we have also had many specialists and other GPs hosting our students for their experience and clinical skills sessions. We are excited to be using more hospital sites and GP services to help us next term.
We would like to thank all the faculty involved in developing…