Skip to main content

Obesity, regulation and grey areas


You don’t have to look far these days to find some discussion of obesity and its causes. This week it was put to the British Medical Association conference that we should ban junk food from hospitals. Two days before this J T Winkler argued in the BMJ that we need a new “brutal pragmatism on food” and that the traditional instruments of public health were all ineffectual or unacceptable in the case of food.

The traditional instruments Winkler laments are education, taxation and regulation.   He does though, comment positively on the Food Standards Agency (FSA) efforts to reduce salt consumption through reformulating food and public awareness campaigns. He is right to laud these efforts, which showed a decrease in average salt intake from 9.5 grams a day in 2000/01 to 8g/d in 2011 as well as adults becoming less likely to add salt at the table over the same period.

Despite concerns over the extent to which board members at the FSA may have had conflicting interests, it seemed generally well regarded and not subject to the severe scepticism which greeted the launch of the Public Health Responsibility Deals. These Deals have been criticised as allowing the food industry a seat at the policy making table, while it seems improbable to be in their interests to reduce the sale of unhealthy foods.  We have recently seen strongly worded pronouncements that the food industry should have no role in the formation of nutrition policy, as well as being billed as vectors of disease by some. 

Some of the scepticism over the Responsibility Deals comes from doubts over the extent to which industry interest will override health concerns, whether monitoring will ever truly be independent and their voluntary nature. A recent review of voluntary agreements between governments and business concluded that many countries are moving towards formal approaches to voluntary agreements and that some of the most effective contain sanctions for non-compliance. Some of the agreements included in their review don’t sound particularly voluntary at all.

This blurring of the line between voluntary agreements and regulation is, it seems, the reason why Winkler condemns regulation as ineffectual but praises the FSA efforts (which in my opinion seem closer to regulation than anything else). It is not clear whether the Responsibility Deals will make the nation healthier, and the review above noted that it is not currently clear whether (or in what circumstances) voluntary agreements can be more effective than more traditional regulation. What is clear is that scepticism around these Deals still remains, and that the potential benefits of reducing the consumption of salt, sugar and fat are still huge.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A View from the Community - Dr Dana Beale

As part of our View from the Community series of articles, our Year 6 Specialty Choice Lead Dr Ros Herbert interviewed community teacher Dr Dana Beale, to get the inside track on what it's like being a community teacher for Imperial College. To read more articles like this, please sign up to our newsletter by emailing b.broglia@imperial.ac.uk

Dana, tell me what first got you interested in homeless medicine? "Incredibly I was inspired by the same module I did as a student at Imperial College that I am now teaching on! Back then it was 'medical and social care of the homeless' and was based at the surgery for the homeless in Great Chapel Street - a fabulous service that showed me that primary care tailored to this vulnerable and challenging group existed and I promised myself there and then that I would return to work in this field."

What makes you so enthusiastic about this work? "I find this line of work a breath of fresh air; at times incredibly challenging …

Introducing the WATCCH Project - Widening Access to Careers in Community Healthcare

The Undergraduate Primary Care Education team in the Department of Primary Care and Public Health at Imperial College London has kicked off an exciting new work experience programme called WATCCH – Widening Access to Careers in Community Healthcare.
There is a shortage of work experience in the health sector for pupils, particularly for those who have no connection to healthcare professionals. WATCCH aims to open up work experience opportunities in the healthcare sector by offering placements for sixth form pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds to shadow various allied healthcare professionals in general practices. These 16/17 year olds have completed their GCSEs with good grades, do not have placements elsewhere, and are the first in their family applying to university. 
Pupils will attend a pre-placement induction at Imperial College's Charing Cross Hospital Campus, and will then have a 3-day work experience session at a general practice where they will observe a variety of allie…

What makes a good placement?

In the New Year, Dr Kevin Patel a GP ST3 on the Imperial VTS, takes a reflective look at the factors that go into making a good clinical attachment for trainees.
As GP trainees we are ‘encouraged’ to reflect; challenging encounters with patients, conversations with colleagues that could have gone better, moments when you felt like you were born to do this job. All of this is good fodder for your ePortfolio.
Not one to miss out on a reflective opportunity, I took a step back from a discussion that was taking place about difficult rotations, a conversation I imagine that is oft-repeated amongst GPs and hospital doctors up and down the country, and thought about how we could use our experience as GP trainees to feed into this.
As trainees we rotate into diverse placements, from paediatrics to public health to care of the elderly. I counted at least 15 distinct departments I have worked in since finishing medical school just over 5 years ago. This is more than any other specialty trainee…