Skip to main content

Obesity, regulation and grey areas


You don’t have to look far these days to find some discussion of obesity and its causes. This week it was put to the British Medical Association conference that we should ban junk food from hospitals. Two days before this J T Winkler argued in the BMJ that we need a new “brutal pragmatism on food” and that the traditional instruments of public health were all ineffectual or unacceptable in the case of food.

The traditional instruments Winkler laments are education, taxation and regulation.   He does though, comment positively on the Food Standards Agency (FSA) efforts to reduce salt consumption through reformulating food and public awareness campaigns. He is right to laud these efforts, which showed a decrease in average salt intake from 9.5 grams a day in 2000/01 to 8g/d in 2011 as well as adults becoming less likely to add salt at the table over the same period.

Despite concerns over the extent to which board members at the FSA may have had conflicting interests, it seemed generally well regarded and not subject to the severe scepticism which greeted the launch of the Public Health Responsibility Deals. These Deals have been criticised as allowing the food industry a seat at the policy making table, while it seems improbable to be in their interests to reduce the sale of unhealthy foods.  We have recently seen strongly worded pronouncements that the food industry should have no role in the formation of nutrition policy, as well as being billed as vectors of disease by some. 

Some of the scepticism over the Responsibility Deals comes from doubts over the extent to which industry interest will override health concerns, whether monitoring will ever truly be independent and their voluntary nature. A recent review of voluntary agreements between governments and business concluded that many countries are moving towards formal approaches to voluntary agreements and that some of the most effective contain sanctions for non-compliance. Some of the agreements included in their review don’t sound particularly voluntary at all.

This blurring of the line between voluntary agreements and regulation is, it seems, the reason why Winkler condemns regulation as ineffectual but praises the FSA efforts (which in my opinion seem closer to regulation than anything else). It is not clear whether the Responsibility Deals will make the nation healthier, and the review above noted that it is not currently clear whether (or in what circumstances) voluntary agreements can be more effective than more traditional regulation. What is clear is that scepticism around these Deals still remains, and that the potential benefits of reducing the consumption of salt, sugar and fat are still huge.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Releasing student potential: Widening access to opportunities in community healthcare

This summer the Department of Primary Care and Public Health kicked off an exciting new programme: Widening Access to Careers in Community Healthcare (WATCCH). We hosted twenty 16-17 year olds who are aspiring to be the first in their families to go to university – at the Charing Cross campus for the inaugural WATCCH project. Our aim was to change perceptions of wider healthcare careers and provide vital work experience for their University applications. Competition was high and the team was very impressed by the number of high calibre students that applied for a place.

Year 12 Pupils from 19 London secondary schools attended an induction day in late July. During the workshop, an experienced multi-professional panel consisting of 5 professionals including an Imperial final year medical student, shared their career journeys with the pupils from their A level to postgraduate degrees. This was followed by pupils creating individual mind maps, which they thoroughly enjoyed, of where they…

Integrated Clinical Apprenticeship - FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

WHAT ARE MY MORNING COMMITMENTS? Your Thursday morning and afternoon throughout your year 5 will be dedicated to the Integrated Clinical Apprenticeship. This has been negotiated with the Year 5 course leads and your Specialty supervisors for each firm. Attendance is mandatory for both morning and afternoon sessions.
You will attend your allocated GP surgery on a time negotiated with your GP mentor.
In the morning, you will see patients from your caseload, assessing their clinical needs and bringing yourself up to date with their secondary care contacts. You can then plan with your patient to attend any secondary care appointments in the coming weeks with your patients.
You may also see “ad hoc” patients from the surgery and, if relevant, add them to your caseload. There will be an opportunity to see other health professionals in the primary care team and assist in their daily activities.

WHAT IS MY PATIENT “CASELOAD”?
This is a group of about 12 patients (shared with your pair), recr…

Congratulations to Usama Syed

Usama Syed, a final year medical student in the Faculty of Medicine, was selected for a 2015 Imperial College London Outstanding Student Achievement Award. These awards are to recognize and commend outstanding achievement beyond the academic subject area.  Usama was nominated for his award by the Department of Primary Care and Public Health.

Usama's achievements include:
Founding a new society at the College - MedTech Imperial- designed to bring together students across the medical, engineering, and computing departments, With colleagues coding a brand new mobile phone application designed to streamline the way front-line hospital staff provide feedback and quality improvement ideas to senior medical directors. Researching and writing articles for the official Imperial College website on medical topics for public release.Editing a newsletter for a Health Centre in Clapham, London. In this role, he has written numerous articles for local residents on topics such as travel safety an…